Sweetwater's
Audio Production Packages



 contact:  Tim Henderson
 (800) 222-4700 ext. 1348

Is your music department as well-equipped as the studio on the left, or is it now beginning to consider integrating technology into it's program for the first time? No matter what phase you might be approaching, careful corroboration and consulting can make the difference between a failed program and nationally recognized success.
Today's choices for Pro Audio products are plentiful and reasonably priced. With a little time and guidance, every music lab can find a package that provides exceptional workstations for every student. Test Question #1:
How much would you pay for this complete lab workstation package?
It wasn't all that long ago when a few hundred bucks couldn't even come close to buying a multitrack recorder of any kind. Heck, back then a few hundred bucks couldn't even come close to just the cost of tape to record a full album! But times change, and for better or worse, we now live in a very different reality. Teenagers today find incredulous the thought of having any limitations on track count, much less a measly four. After all, what kind of record could you possibly make with a measly four-track recorder? (Watch it, kid. Now we're talking about some of my favorite records!)

I know. You're probably thinking that I don't understand your school's situation. I know that for some schools the thought of spending $200 is almost laughable. For others, that much would completely drain the year's entire budget (combined with last year's budget, earned by the diligent sales of candy bars and pepperoni sticks). Well, as good as we have it today, you still can't get something for nothing. But if there's at least something in your school's coffers, keep reading, because I'm willing to bet that you'd be shocked to discover just what is available these days and the ridiculous prices that match. I'm telling you - it can be downright exciting! And this is coming from a guy who has no business being shocked or excited about any of it, a guy who's full-time job now is to keep up with the constant flood of new products proliferating today's pro audio marketplace. If anybody should be not interested, unimpressed, and completely numb, it should definitely be me! But here I sit, typing with enthusiasm about both industry-standard gear that you need to be familiar with, if not use, and new gear that you possibly haven't even heard of before. Are you ready to jump in?


The Signal Chain

Let's start from the beginning of the signal chain and move logically forward. The first order of attention should be a sound source such as a vocal or instrument, but since we're assuming that you already have plenty of vocalists and instrumentalists (I don't actually sell those), we'll start with the microphone.

Microphones

There are many types of microphones, including capacitor (more commonly known as condenser), dynamic, ribbon, boundary ("PZM"), piezo, carbon, and laser microphones. There are also subsets of categories such as electret condensers (a type of condenser) and ribbon mics (a type of dynamic). I will not try to explain how or why these microphones work, but I will briefly describe the characteristics of the more common microphones.


Soundcraft Mixer, Emu soundcard, Shure microphone, a pair of Yamaha headphones, all neccesary cables, and all of the following software ...






ANSWER: Lab Pack - under $300.
Dynamic microphonestend to be used for miking instruments rather than vocals in a recording situation. This is most likely due to their general lack of "brilliance", and brilliance is something we have trained our ears to expect on vocal tracks. However, a good dynamic can absolutely save a vocal take when you encounter an unusually bright or gritty sounding vocalist for which no condenser seems to be able to complement. In these situations, engineers may try to use a Shure SM7, EV RE20, Sennheiser 441, or even a Sennheiser 421 or SM 57. In fact, you might be surprised if you read a list of all the records with dynamic mics on the vocal track. A dynamic would also be a good choice if budget allows for only one mic that needs to serve double-duty as a live and studio vocal mic.

For instruments, dynamics tend to work well on drums (close-miked),
bass and electric guitar cabinets, brass, and anything else that emits a high sound pressure level. To say that dynamic mics are perfect for "anything with a lot of volume" would be an overstatement, but it would at least provide a good starting point.

Dynamic mics of note are the popular
Shure SM and Beta series (especially 57 and 58), the Audix 1-5, OM and D-series (D2, D4, D6), Sennheiser 421, 441, and e609, AKG D112, Audio Technica ATM25 and AE2500, BeyerDynamic M, TG, and Opus Series, and Electro Voice RE-20.
   
   Shure SM-57         Shure SM 58
Condenser microphones come in two varieties: large and small diaphram.

Large diaphram condensers (LDC) have an exceptional ability to capture minute details of a performance while usually managing to accentuate key pleasant frequencies of the human voice. However, keep in mind that there is no such thing as the fabled "perfect vocal mic" because
every vocalist has some aspect of their voice that is inimitable. Therefore, one microphone cannot possibly be an ideal match for everyone.

LDC's can also be great for instruments, specifically stringed instruments such as acoustic guitar, piano, and violin. They can also sound fantastic on drums, especially as ambient mics, overheads, or on kick. A dead-sounding bass guitar can spring to life with an LDC on the cabinet instead of a typical dynamic mic or direct inject box (DI).

There are an enormous amount of LDC's on the market, so I'll just list a few of my favorites in varying price ranges. In the inexpensive range are the Studio Projects TB-1 and Audio Technica's 2020 and 4040. Some favorite mid-priced mics are the Rode K2, Mojave MA200,
Audio Technica 4050, and Blue Mouse, Dragonfly, and Blueberry. The Soundelux U99, Sony C-37a, and Neumann M149, (what? No U87?), are some of the more expensive mics that I really like.
   
Mojave MA-20    Blue Dragonfly
Small Diaphragm Condensers (SDC) are the other common condenser mic. They are commonly used in pairs to capture a stereo image of a source. Typical uses are for choirs, stringed instruments, and drum overheads. They do an exceptional job at reproducing extended high frequencies in a true manner. It is of interest to note that they actually have a flatter frequency response than LDC's in most cases. This can be somewhat of a surprise at first since they often seem rolled off in the low end and boosted in the highs. I have never seen one used for a lead vocal, probably because a truly flat frequency response is simply unflattering. This is also probably why most EQ's are rarely set to be perfectly flat in people's home and car stereos. I guess most people prefer icing on a cake!

Some SDC's of note in varying price ranges are: Oktava MC-012 and MK-012 (though production quality is inconsistent), Audio-Technica Pro 37r, 4041, and 4051, Neumann KM 184, DPA 4011, Shure SM 81, AKG 451, Rode NT-5, Sennheiser e914 and MKH50, and the Audix SCX-1.
                  
  Neumann KM 184       Rode NT-5
A general observation

With many of today's records being made by a new generation of "bedroom engineers", we are being exposed to just about every mic technique one could imagine. Miking concepts and techniques that would have not even been considered in the past may be used gratuitously today. Incidentally, the same is true for mixing techniques. My belief in this matter is that because there are so many more people making records today (due to the overwhelming number of low-cost, computer based bedroom studios), the chances of the norm being redefined is practically inevitable. Also, because many of these recordists lack formal training, they tend to stumble onto more unconventional uses for mics than their predecessors would have. Sometimes, the technique embraced by conventional wisdom might be thrown out the window in favor of the unorthodox simply because one may have never known what conventional was. More often than not this simply leads to an unarguably bad sound, but there are surely times when the new recordist ignorantly discovers the sound that next year's engineers will die trying to imitate. Chances are they could have saved their lives if they'd only known that the elusive guitar tone they'd been dying for could have been obtained by dropping a crisp twenty at Radio Shack!
Microphone Preamps

Definition: "That magical piece of gear that turns your inaudible little signal into a full and robust line-level signal." Mic pre's typically boost the amplitude of an incoming signal anywhere from 20 dB to 70 dB.

Sometimes when I mention mic pre's I get asked, "But do I really need one?". Yes sir/ma'am, you absolutely do. That is unless you want your mic to become the functional equivalent of a paperweight (
a rather handsome, overpriced paperweight, I concede). You will simply not be able to use a microphone without one.

The mic pre also does something to the quality of a signal that is much more than just boosting the level. What I have discovered is that a great preamp will make your mic sound more like your micthe way it was intended to sound all along. A great mic pre will differentiate and separate the mics sitting in a mic closet. For example, a $5,000 LDC will sound a lot like a $500 LDC when fed through a mediocre mic pre. Most of the nuances that can make that mic sound truly phenonenol are buried under a blanket of auditory fog. Now do the same thing through a world-class pre and, voila!, your $5,000 mic leaps alive, becoming what it was created to be.

A mic pre can also be strategically used to compliment or enhance the mic being used depending on the end result you are going for. Most people today find a tube sound desirable, but there may be such thing as "too much of a good thing". For example, a tube mic ran through a tube preamp can make your vocalist sound like he or she is swimming in a mud bath. On the other hand, if you know exactly the right tube mic and tube pre to use, and you couple that combination with the correct singer, you just might end up with something magical. Norah Jones did it, and people bought her vocal-centered record by the millions.

In my view, there are three categories of mic pre's: pristine pre's, character pre's, and "couldn't afford a real pre" pre's. The pristine ones, like Grace, True, and GML, are meant to simply pass the signal on through the chain without altering it's general quality. A character pre is designed to add some kind of noticeable (hopefully complementary) sonic signature to the source it is being fed. The third category, which we all own, is every preamp under about $500. (I know that sounds harsh, but prove me wrong if you know something I don't.) They only do an average job, but often do even worse. Many times these pre's make me think of a vocalist trying to use a pillow as a pop filter. It can make for a very frustrating problem at mix down because there's really no way to just "magically" add something back to the signal to make it all better. In fact, many times all of that "fix-it-in-the-mix" processing just makes the track sound more artificial and usually worse than it was. If the plug-in is named "Spark-lifier", "Life-limator", or something thereabouts, I've found that the names proved to be just a wee hyperbolic.

Since I don't recommend with any real conviction any mic pre's under $500 and nearly every pre I've heard that costs more than that is useful in some way, I'll just mention some names rather than give recommendations. If I gave recommendations I would just end up naming every pre with a $500+ price tag! The cheapest mic pre that I give the honor of being in the "useful" category is the Presonus Eureka ($500). From there, you can choose from Manley,
D.W. Fearn, Vintech, Daking, Crane Song, Summit, Tube Tech, Great River, Langevin, John Hardy, Focusrite, Millenia, Groove Tubes, Avalon, GML, Earthworks, Universal Audio,  and many, many more (really).




ART MPA Gold




Groove Tubes Vipre





Avalon AD 2022






PreSonus ADL 600




Langevin Dual Vocal Combo




Blue Robbie

Audio Interfaces


In simple terms, an audio interface is just the connection device between the audio on the outside of your computer and the audio on the inside. Early computer audio interfaces were PCI cards, but in the last 5 years or so, Firewire and USB interfaces have also achieved a large amount of success. With USB (1.1) you gain a lot of stability from a mature spec, but are usually limited to 2-4 audio tracks being recorded or played back at once (depending on the sample rate). Firewire and PCI have much higher bandwidth than USB and usually far exceed what is required for simultaneous inputs and outputs. USB 2.0 was a promising spec for portable interfaces due to it's enormous speed and bandwith, but it has not yet seemed to overcome problems inherent in the way it transfers data. Because of this, there are only two USB 2.0 interfaces on the market now that I am aware of, and one of them has received poor reviews for instability.

Many audio interfaces have MIDI connections already built-in, as manufacturers realize that most of this market will need that feature as well. However, I have had a few clients inadvertantly buy an interface without a MIDI connection, thinking that they all included MIDI. Be sure to double-check if you need it to have both features. 

The factors that make an interface good or not usually have to do with it's power supply, digital to analog (D/A) and analog to digital (A/D) converters, clock, and the quality of the analog section. In this category, the ol' saying “You get what you pay for” is most certainly true. It is simply impossible to build an interface with cheap analog components, a true low-jitter clock, fully discrete preamps, and top-of-the-line converters at a budget price; the components just cost too much. The compromises manisfest as integrated circuits, consumer-level converters, and often times wall warts for power supplies. It is true that for many educational situations the practical difference in audio quality may not be a big factor. I would argue that it is more important to have a full feature set as a student and compromise some degree of quality if neccesary, rather than buying the highest quality single-channel interface on the market. The more features a student can become familiar with, the greater their self-confidence will be in the real world where they are confronted with a plethora of configurations. Of course, the ideal situation is to have both features and quality. This way a student can learn to recognize excellent tone so they can have a clear goal of what to aspite to in the real world.

Products worthy of note in this category are as follows: the Emu 1212m and 1820m (both PCI), Line 6 Toneport UX2, Edirol UA-25, and Digidesign M-Box2 (all USB 1.1), and the Presonus Firebox, Focusrite Saffire, and Digidesign Digi 002r (Firewire devices). All of these interfaces are exceptional in some way, whether that be price, quality, or a unique feature set. Please call me directly if you would like to discuss audio interfaces specifically for your unique situation.





Line 6 Toneport UX-2





Edirol UA-25





Digidesign 002 Rack




Apogee MiniMe USB
Software

Audio/MIDI recording

The industry standard recording software right now is Digidesign's Pro Tools. Although it is truly a powerful recording package in itself, it does not mean that it is necessarily the best, because "best" in this category greatly depends on your needs, style of working, and other factors. Here are some important questions you may want to ask yourself before narrowing your choice of audio/MIDI recorders.
  • Will I be exchanging files with one or more studios frequently?
  • How many total audio tracks do I need?  (Be realistic).
  • Will I be primarily focusing on the audio or the MIDI features?
  • How long do I have to learn this software? Days? Weeks? Months?
  • Will I be using the Mac OS or Windows, or maybe even Linux?
  • What is more important - quality of sound or ease of use?
  • Am I okay using lesser known software if it meets our needs? 
  • How much am I willing to spend?
  • Is it important to be able to alter the look, function, and feel?
As you are answering these questions you will likely have more unexpected questions materialize. This is good! The bad news is that without spending weeks, or perhaps even months studying every software package available, you will probably not be confident that you are choosing the right package. The good news is that I have spent years being intimately involved with this category of software. Be at ease knowing that I am happy to spend as much time consulting with you as is necessary to make sure your choice meets your needs and that when you do make a choice to buy, you do so with confidence.

I cannot go into feature sets now because that could easily fill an entire book. I will give you a list of some software though. The major audio/MIDI recording choices are Pro Tools, Cubase, Nuendo, Sonar, Logic, Digital Performer, and Ableton Live. There are plenty of others that aren't quite as popular but still put out a strong product, like Tracktion, Fruity Loops, Pro Tracks Plus, Kristal, N-Track, Adobe Audition, Audacity, Pyramix, and SAW Studio, with many others vying for their place among these fine products. There are a few other programs that I think are at least interesting, if not promising. Ardour, Rosegarden, and Wired are all free Linux-based recorders. There is a sincere hope among the Linux community that they will eventually be the future of home recording. However, there are far too many hardware difficulties to overcome at their current states to make any of these a practical choice for a music lab. But as they say, "The future's so bright, I gotta wear shades!".





Digidesign's Pro Tools



Steinberg's Cubase SX



Cakewalk's Sonar
Mastering

It is usually better to complete your mastering stage in a separate mastering program if possible. This is because there are specific editing tools and features built in to these programs that make the process much more efficient and just plain easier. Also, many of the unique processes that mastering requires are often included with the editor itself. This is not to mention integrated support for advanced production of Red Book CD's and other output methods.

Thankfuly, this category is not nearly as crowded as some of the others we have seen thus far. The standard programs are Steinberg's Wavelab, Sony's Soundforge, Bias Peak, Magix Samplitude V8 Master, and IK Multimedia T-Racks 24. There are also many 3rd party plug-ins that run within mutitrack recorders or mastering programs that provide essential mastering processing.

Finally, all-in-one hardware mastering units are worth mentioning in this category because they are a useful and easy way to create masters. These products include
the Alesis Masterlink, TC Electronic Finalizer, Drawmer DC2476A, and the DBX Quantum II. Though many tracking and mixing studios have converted to a completely digital environment, many mastering studios still have analog components integrated with digital equipment. Common mastering hardware processors are the GML 8200, Manley's Massive Passive, Waves' L2 limiter, and the Allen Smart C2.



Steinberg Wavelab




GML 8200


Notation


The notation and scoring software market at one time was a crowded market with many products that all seemed difficult to learn and sometimes just not even worth the effort.  However, the last few years has found Sibelius and Finale earn the top two positions in this market. They both have made tremendous progress in user-friendliness while at the same time adding even more useful features. This is a welcome change to me, as a bitter memory from my college experience was fumbling through primitive versions of Finale. But just as these two programs were becoming more user-friendly, along came an unexpected surprise. A company called VirtuosoWorks recently released a powerful and easy to use software simply titled "Notion". The founder of the company is Jack M. Jarrett, professor, composer, and of course, software developer. Many years ago Mr. Jarrett developed Music Printer Plus, a mildy successful notation software. With that software being out of production and many more years of assessing crucial concepts and features missing in other notation editors, he created Notion. It is difficult to describe what makes Notion so special without actually seeing a demonstration of it. On one hand, it does most of what Finale and Sibelius can do; on the other hand, it is completely different. The best way I could try to describe in simple terms what makes it so unique is that it combines the rigid mathematical preciseness of other programs, but adds the too often missing dimension of art. The ebb and flow of human expression in Notion enables your score to sound like it is leaping off the page and dancing around you. Please click <here> to see more.

All three of these programs have excellent orchestral samples included with the purchase price of the software. This means that you no longer have to disrespect Beethoven's 9th by playing it back with Casio-quality general MIDI sounds. This is a true relief for sore ears!






Make Music's Finale 2006



VirtuosoWorks Notion

Video

Video editors are not my area of expertise, although I am familiar with the insdustry-standard Adobe Premiere, Apple Final Cut (with both Express HD and Studio versions), and Sony Vegas. Avidemux and Cinelerra are interesting alternatives for those brave enough to be using Linux for this purpose.

I won't go into much detail in this section.  However, it is noteworthy that Apple's Final Cut Studio package is a fantastic bargain considering it not only includes the ultra-powerful Final Cut video editor, but Motion 2, DVD Studio 4, and Soundtrack Pro as well. Soundtrack Pro is an excellent audio editor and loop player with features that even top-dollar audio editors haven't thought of. This is a powerful package at a reasonable price.  




Apple Final Cut Studio


Educational - Theory

If you are looking for a software package to augment your courses on ear training, chord structures, scales and modes, and other aspects of theory, ARS Nova Practica Musica is a very solid choice. There are over 80 theory and ear training lessons that allow students to focus on specific skills. They cover rhythm tapping, interval recognition, chord spelling, polyphonic dictation, and much more. Because of the enormous number of lessons, it makes it suitable for using year after year as a student progresses. One great feature in this software is it's ability to respond to questions by singing into a microphone.  You've got to love technology!

I personally used a program in college called Auralia, which is distributed by Sibelius (as in the notation program). I found Auralia to be not only extremely educational, but very enjoyable to use as well. It covered the same basic concepts as Practica Musica. I never did master the higher levels of Auralia. When they throw a 4 bar jazz progression at you and expect you to notate all the chords with their correct inversions, you're bound to stumble from time to time! I know that our instructors liked the automated grading capabilites and progress measurements that are built in, as well as the pre-programmed tests and finals.






ARS Nova Practica Musica 4

Educational - Instructional

If your background is rooted in a more traditional music education paradigm and you view computer integration as a new, yet neccesary evil, then tutorial books and videos are something you need to invest in. There are a number of companies that do nothing but create educational books, CD Rom's, and DVD's. They can dissect specific software down to it's simplest components, showing you every step that is taken to accomplish a given task.  Courses from absolute beginner to master level are readily available to be required class materials or as a way to bolster your level of confidence in teaching others.

Available products are by companies such as Groovebox Music, Secrets of the Pros, and Course Technology. Most tutorials, however, seem to be produced directly by the companies that make the software they are teaching you how to use. I suppose they would know best!



Secrets of the Pros
Pro Tools DVD vol. 1

Furniture

There is not much to say about this topic.  The best thing to do is to click <here> and simply browse the wide range of sizes and options available.



Conclusion

I sincerely thank you for taking time to read my preliminary thoughts on a wide variety of music products. The reason I wrote this article is was not to expect you to suddenly be able to choose all the right things, but rather to help you better understand the concepts of what we can discuss when you call. The products I have mentioned are a small fraction of what is actually available today, and there is never a "one size fits all" package. This is why I am making myself available as a resource for you. I will consult with you for as long as is necessary to guide you into the right products for your individual needs. I genuinely look forward to talking with you soon!


Tim Henderson

Sweetwater Sound

(800) 222-4700 xt. 1348

tim_henderson@sweetwater.com
www.sweetwater.com



p.s. If you haven't already done so, please click <here> to read the introduction to Sweetwater Sound. There you can learn more about our free consulting services as well as our free technical support department available to educational institutions.




MAP Edit Center